Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 357
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 8:2021cv02597
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adu-Beniako v. Medical Board of California (MDC) et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv12410
Plaintiff: Solomon Adu-Beniako
Defendant: Medical Board of California (MDC) and American Medical Association (AMA)
Paul Isaacson, et al v. Mark Brnovich, et al
as 21-16645
Plaintiff / Appellee: PAUL A. ISAACSON, M.D., on behalf of himself and his patients, ERIC M. REUSS, M.D., M.P.H,; on behalf of himself and his patients, NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN, INC., Arizona Section and others
Defendant / Appellant: MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, Attorney General of Arizona, in his official capacity, ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES, DON HERRINGTON, Interim Director of the Arizona Department of Health Services and others
Defendant: MICHAEL B. WHITING, County Attorney for Apache County, in his official capacity, BRIAN M. MCINTYRE, County Attorney for Cochise County, in his official capacity, WILLIAM PATRICK RING, County Attorney for Coconino County, in his official capacity and others
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MISSOURI, STATE OF ALABAMA, STATE OR ARKANSAS, STATE OF GEORGIA, STATE OF KANSAS, STATE OF IDAHO, STATE OF LOUISIANA, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, STATE OF MONTANA, STATE OF NEBRASKA, STATE OF OHIO, STATE OF OKLAHOMA, STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA, STATE
Singleton v. SDG&E, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2021cv01594
Plaintiff: Raymonda Singleton
Defendant: SDG&E, Cox Internet, Allconnect and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pi
Dylan Brandt, et al v. Leslie Rutledge, et al
as 21-2875
Plaintiff / Appellee: Dylan Brandt, by and through his mother Joanna Brandt, Joanna Brandt, Sabrina Jennen, by and through her parents Lacey and Aaron Jennen and others
Defendant / Appellant: Leslie Rutledge, in her official capacity as the Arkansas Attorney General, Amy E. Embry, in her official capacity as the Executive Director of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Sylvia D. Simon, in official capacity as member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Kaul et al v. Intercontinental Exchange et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv06992
Plaintiff: M.D. Richard Arjun Kaul, MD David Basch, Jane Doe and others
Defendant: Intercontinental Exchange, GEICO, TD Bank and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Little Rock Fam Planning Svcs, et al v. Larry Jegley, et al
as 21-2857
Plaintiff / Appellee: Little Rock Family Planning Services, on behalf of itself and its patients, Planned Parenthood of Arkansas & Eastern Oklahoma, on behalf of itself and its patients, doing business as Planned Parenthood Great Plains and Janet R. Cathey, M.D. on behalf of herself and her patients
Defendant / Appellant: Larry Jegley, in his official capacity as Prosecuting Attorney of Pulaski County, Sylvia D. Simon, M.D. in her official capacity as Chairman of the Arkansas State Medical Board, Robert Breving, M.D., in his official capacity as officer/member of the Arkansas State Medical Board and others
Isaacson et al v. Brnovich et al Featured Case We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv01417
Plaintiff: Paul A Isaacson, Eric M Reuss, National Council of Jewish Women (Arizona Section) Incorporated and others
Defendant: Mark Brnovich, Michael Whiting, Brian McIntyre and others
Intervenor Defendant: Sharing Down Syndrome Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Finch v. Texas Medical Board
as 21-10800
Plaintiff / Appellant: Drake Jordan Finch
Defendant / Appellee: Texas Medical Board and Texas Department of Criminal Justice
Aleman v. Texas Medical Board et al
as 7:2021cv00237
Defendant: Texas Medical Board, Sherif Z. Zaafran, M.D., Scott M Freshour and others
Plaintiff: Ruben Aleman, M.D.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?