Cases 61 - 70 of 118
USA v. Raymond Jone
as 15-1708
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAYMOND JONES
Jones v. USA
as 1:2014cv01719
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Raymond Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
United States of America v. Jones (USA)
as 14-1491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellee:
Raymond Jones
Jones et al v. Ameriprise Insurance Company et al
as 2:2014cv00216
Plaintiff:
Raymond Jones and Yan Zhu
Defendant:
Ameriprise Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Malipurathu v. Jones, et al
as 13-6202
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS MALIPURATHU
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND JONES, CEO, DARP Foundation, MACK BENTLEY, HR Director, DARP Foundation, KEITH A. HUTTON, Counselor and others
Jones #417528 v. MacLaren
as 2:2013cv00208
Petitioner:
Russell Raymond Jones #417528
Respondent:
Duncan MacLaren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
In re: Charles Breslin, et al
as 13-1372
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: CHARLES B. BRESLIN, PAUL J. CUNNINGHAM and PHILLIP E. THOMPSON
Defendant - Respondent:
DICKISON TOWNSHIP, RAYMOND JONES, DANIEL WYRICK and others
Nominal Respondent:
LAWRENCE F STENGEL
McLeod v. Lawrence County, Ohio/Board of Lawrence County Commissioners et al
as 1:2013cv00007
Plaintiff:
Curtis McLeod
Defendant:
Lawrence County, Ohio/Board of Lawrence County Commissioners, Jeffery S. Lawless, Rodolpho Canos, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones et al v. Bank of America, National Association
as 2:2012cv00561
Plaintiff:
Raymond Jones, Sr., Sharon Brothers Parker and William A. Brothers
Defendant:
Bank of America, National Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Malipurathu v. Jones, et al
as 12-6249
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DENNIS MALIPURATHU
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND JONES, CEO, DARP Foundation, MACK BENTLEY, HR Director, DARP Foundation, KEITH A. HUTTON, Counselor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
