Cases 61 - 70 of 118
Francis v. USA
as 1:2014cv00290
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Loxley Robert Francis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DOUGLAS v. CITY OF AMERICUS GEORGIA et al
as 1:2014cv00097
Plaintiff:
BRANDON KENTRELL DOUGLAS
Defendant:
CITY OF AMERICUS GEORGIA, BARRY BLOUNT, CARLA COOK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Francis v. United State
as 14-2350
Petitioner:
Robert Francis
Respondent:
United States of America
Wright v. Thomas et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2014cv00448
Plaintiff:
Robert Francis Wright
Defendant:
Kim Tobias Thomas and Christopher Gordy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arney, et al v. Hayden, et al
as 14-3107
Plaintiff:
RICKEY RAY REDFORD, ROBERT DEMASS, THOMAS H. PORTER and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RAYMOND ROBERTS, CHARLES E. SIMMONS and BILL GRAVES
Movant To Intervene:
THOMAS ODELL KELLY and KENNETH JACKSON
Movant To Intervene - Appellant:
KENNETH D. LEEK
Medical Mutual Insurance Co v. Image Guided Pain Management
as 14-1396
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MEDICAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH CAROLINA
Defendant - Appellee:
IMAGE GUIDED PAIN MANAGEMENT, P.C., JOHN MILLIGAN MATHIAS, M.D. and ROBERT FRANCIS O'BRIEN, M.D.
Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees et al v. Quinn Painting & Decorating, a California General Partnership et al
as 4:2014cv01836
Plaintiff:
Bay Area Painters and Tapers Pension Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees , District Council 16 Northern California Health and Welfare Trust Fund, its Joint Board of Trustees, and Chris Christopherson as Trustee , District Council 16 Northern California Apprentice and Journeyman Training Trust Fund, and its Joint Board of Trustees and others
Defendant:
Quinn Painting & Decorating, James Patrick Quinn and Robert Francis Quinn
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
ALLISON v. CREWS
as 5:2014cv00035
Plaintiff:
ROBERT FRANCIS ALLISON
Defendant:
MICHAEL D CREWS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
