Cases 61 - 70 of 192
Manuel Enrique Rosales v. John Davison Rockefeller IV et al
as 2:2018cv02547
Defendant:
Jane Golden Belford, Jane Golden Belford, John Davison Rockefeller, IV and others
Plaintiff:
Manuel Enrique Rosales
Nicholas Rockefeller v. Perkins Coie LLP et al
as 2:2018cv02150
Defendant:
DOES, Perkins Coie California, P.C. and Perkins Coie LLP
Plaintiff:
Nicholas Rockefeller
Hunter v. United States House of Representatives et al
as 0:2018cv00327
Plaintiff:
Dannez W. Hunter
Defendant:
United States House of Representatives, John D.J. Rockefeller, IV, Hillary R. Clinton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01997
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv08682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 17-3077
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Dallas Police & Fire Pension System v. Alexander
as 4:2017cv00631
Plaintiff:
Dallas Police & Fire Pension System
Defendant:
Columbus A. Alexander, III
Counter_defendant:
Kelly Gottschalk , Joshua Mond , Summer Loveland and others
Counter_claimant:
Columbus A. Alexander, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Dukes v. Duke Mehal Rockefeller
as 3:2017cv02304
Plaintiff:
Rico Cortez Dukes
Defendant:
Duke Mehal Rockefeller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rose v. Nettles et al
as 0:2017cv02000
Plaintiff:
James Rose
Defendant:
Thierry Nettles, Andrew Rockefeller, William Cline and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Percy et al v. Brennan et al
as NYS/1:73-cv-04279
Plaintiff:
Albert E. Percy , John Mercado , Manuel Mejia and others
Defendant:
Peter J. Brennan , United States Department of Labor , Bernard DeLury and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
