Cases 61 - 70 of 96
Gooden v. Stephens Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 7:2013cv00107
Defendant:
William Stephens Director TDCJ-CID, Haywood Talib, Chaplain Hartwell and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick Deone Gooden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Orville Lynch v. BAC Home Loans Servicing LP et al
as 2:2013cv02967
Defendant:
BAC Home Loans Servicing LP, John Does, MERSCORP and others
Plaintiff:
Orville Lynch
Parker et al v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice (TDCJ)
as 7:2013cv00018
Plaintiff:
Nedro Gwen Parker and Frederick Deone Gooden
Defendant:
Richard E Wathen, James D Anders, Charles Horsley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Samuelson v. Minnesota, State of et al
as 0:2012cv03019
Plaintiff:
Steven Scott Samuelson
Defendant:
Minnesota, State of, Itasca, County of, Jon Maturi and others
HANCOCK BANK v. WEBB DIVERSIFIED INC et al
as 4:2012cv00607
Plaintiff:
HANCOCK BANK
Defendant:
WEBB DIVERSIFIED INC , WEBB DIVERSIFIED LLC , WAYNE S WEBB and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Negotiable Instrument
StanCorp Investment Advisers, Inc. v. Webb et al
as 3:2012cv01041
Plaintiff:
StanCorp Investment Advisers, Inc.
Defendant:
David S. Webb and Webb Financial Advisors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
WEBB et al v. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
as 1:2012cv00448
Defendant:
STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY
Plaintiff:
CHARLES S. WEBB, III and MARITZA WEBB
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Jesus Silguero, Jr. v. Eddie Williams, et al
as 12-10309
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JESUS RAMIREZ SILGUERO, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
EDDIE C. WILLIAMS, JIMMY S WEBB, MAJOR HARRIS, III and others
Houston v. Hilton et al
as 3:2012mc00012
Plaintiff:
Clifford Leon Houston
Defendant:
Stacia Hilton, James Thomas Fowler, Ronald Gibbs and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00105
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
