Cases 61 - 70 of 266,046
Williams v. United States Government
as 3:2024cv00255
Plaintiff:
Travis B Williams
Defendant:
United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
John Doe (RLM) v. Lee et al
as 3:2024cv00692
Plaintiff:
John Doe (RLM)
Defendant:
William B. Lee and David B. Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Get Loud Arkansas et al v. Thurston et al
as 5:2024cv05121
Plaintiff:
Get Loud Arkansas, Vote.org, Nikki Pastor and others
Defendant:
John Thurston, Sharon Brooks, Jamie Clemmer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wang v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00989
Plaintiff:
Lishan Wang
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, William Tong, Nick Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley et al v. The City of Columbus et al
as 2:2024cv03118
Plaintiff:
Jalen Bradley and Ja-Dawn Bradley
Defendant:
The City of Columbus, The City of Columbus Division of Police, Carl Harmon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Brewer v. Burns et al
as 2:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Dennis Sheldon Brewer
Defendant:
William Burns et al
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
(HC) Bond v. Sacramento County
as 2:2024cv01598
Petitioner:
William Anthony Bond
Respondent:
Sacramento County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Smith et al.
as 6:2024cv01038
Plaintiff:
William Andre Jemel Wright
Defendant:
Officer L. Smith and City of Oviedo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Spalding County Law Authorities
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Charles Bernard Williams
Defendant:
Spalding County Law Authorities
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis Williams v. Pescatore et al
as 9:2024cv03374
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Lewis Williams
Defendant:
Joseph Pescatore and Rockwell Amusements & Promotions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
