Cases 71 - 80 of 199
ADAMS et al v. WAUPACA FOUNDRY
as 3:2017cv00140
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER ADAMS, JARED AHL, ERIC ALDERSON and others
Miscellaneou:
WILLIAM CARWILE, JR.
Defendant:
WAUPACA FOUNDRY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Reeves et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv03744
Plaintiff:
Karen Reeves , Retha Clememts , Shereel Connolly and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific, Corp. and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castello v. New Orleans City et al
as 2:2017cv06535
Plaintiff:
Freddie O. Castello, III
Defendant:
New Orleans City , Code Enforcement, Mosquito, Termite & Rodent Control and others
Cause Of Action: 00 U.S.C. § 0000
Ward et al v. Harrell et al
as 1:2017cv00187
Plaintiff:
Tobias Ward , Teresa Ward , T. W. and others
Defendant:
Philana Harrell, Kimmerce Fairley, Carolyn O'Banner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv03402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Reeves et al v. Boston Scientific Corp. et al
as 4:2017cv01436
Plaintiff:
Karen Reeves , Retha Clememts , Shereel Connolly and others
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corp. and Doe Manufacturers 1-100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv02113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ade Jessie Warren v. J. Castello
as 5:2017cv00338
Respondent:
J. Castello
Petitioner:
Ade Jessie Warren
Tantlinger v. Duchaine, et al
as 16-1484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHRISTOPHER TANTLINGER
Defendant - Appellee:
LOUIS DUCHAINE, invividually, BURLEIGH CASTELLO, individually and STEVE HARTLEY, individually and in his official capacity
Magee v. Scribner
as 3:2016cv06702
Petitioner:
Ruchell Cinque Magee
Respondent:
A. K. Scribner and J. Castello
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
