Cases 71 - 80 of 100
Mammele v. City of Fruitland Park, Florida et al
as 5:2026cv00654
Plaintiff:
Maximillan Mammele
Defendant:
City of Fruitland Park, Florida, Gavin Heffler, Anthony Bunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00208
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. DOC
as 26-2555
Plaintiff:
GREGORY JOHNSON
Defendant:
CONNECTICUT DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, In it's official capacity, ANGEL QUIROS, In their individual and official capacities, WILLIAM MULLIGAN, In their individual and official capacities and others
US v. Anthony Coles
as 26-4466
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
ANTHONY BERNARD COLES, a/k/a Pay Day, a/k/a Him Him
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv10396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Kelly Surtin v. City of O'Fallon, et al
as 26-2832
Plaintiff:
Kelly Surtin
Defendant:
City of O'Fallon, City of St. Charles, City of St. Peters and others
MANGANARO v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 5:2026cv07024
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY MANGANARO
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Alston v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv04293
Plaintiff:
Anthony Alston, II
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Washington v. Fang et al
as 4:2026cv01467
Plaintiff:
Leo Washington
Defendant:
Vanessa Fang, Jasmine LeCont McClanahan, Rowan F. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Washington v. Fang et al
as 1:2026cv00645
Plaintiff:
Leo Washington
Defendant:
Vanessa Fang, Jasmine LeCont McClanahan, Rowan Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
