Cases 71 - 80 of 163
Marshall v. Maddox
as 3:2015cv03138
Plaintiff:
Marqnkie D. Marshall
Defendant:
R. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marshall v. USA
as 4:2015cv00223
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
William D Marshall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Kanies v. John D. Marshall MD PC Restated Defined Benefit Pension Plan et al
as 2:2015cv00445
Plaintiff:
Annette Kanies
Defendant:
John D. Marshall MD PC Restated Defined Benefit Pension Plan , John D. Marshall MD PC and John D Marshall
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
A & B Campbell Family et al v. Chesakpeake Energy Corporation et al
as 3:2015cv00340
Plaintiff:
A & B Campbell Family , Eugene J Barrett, Jr. , Lori R Barrett and others
Defendant:
Chesakpeake Energy Corporation, Chesapeake Appalachia,L.L.C., Chesapeake Energy Marketing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Marshall v. Colvin
as 3:2014cv00608
Plaintiff:
Sylvia D. Marshall
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Employers Mutual Casualty Company v. Accuracy Glass & Mirror Company, Inc. et al
as 2:2014cv01744
Defendant:
Accuracy Glass & Mirror Company, Inc., Debra Lamek, Michael A Lamek and others
Plaintiff:
Employers Mutual Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Marshall v. Radius Hospital Management II, Inc.
as 1:2014cv13867
Plaintiff:
Shannon D Marshall
Defendant:
Radius Hospital Management II, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Co
as 6:2014cv02541
Plaintiff:
Constance Jones , Jones Ernest, Sr , E'mon Jones and others
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01569
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
United States v. William Marshall
as 14-2028
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
William D. Marshall, also known as B.G.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
