Cases 71 - 80 of 929
NAVE v. WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC et al
as 1:2022cv02061
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEE NAVE JR
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH OF INDIANA LLC and SAMUEL J. BYRD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pilgrim v. Moates et al
as 4:2022cv00223
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Pilgrim
Defendant:
Sheriff Johnny Moates and Chairman Hal Floyd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reule, et al v Skeen, et al
as 6:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
Christine Reule, Harriet Nicholson, Rebecca Alexander Foster and others
Defendant:
Judge Jack Skeen, Jr., Penny Clarkston and Megan LaVoie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tutankhaman v. Hill
as 2:2022cv01500
Plaintiff:
King Michael Tutankhaman, Grand Royal Prince Michael Dumpledore III and Michael Maxwell Hill
Defendant:
Jimmy Lee Thompson Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SANDERS v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv14881
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEE SANDERS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ARMEL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv11956
Plaintiff:
JIMMY LEE ARMEL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
USA v. Smart
as 22-20409
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Jimmy Lee Smart
Davis v. McCleave et al
as 3:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Lee Davis
Defendant:
Charmaine McCleave, Latrease Funches and M. Brewer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paul Canady, II v. James Holder
as 22-1824
Plaintiff / Appellant:
PAUL TRUETT CANADY, II, Administrator for the Estate of Jimmie Andrew Underwood, a/k/a James Blackmon, a/k/a James Blackman, a/k/a Jimmy Lee Hooker
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES HOLDER, in his individual capacity, ANDREW MUNDAY, in his individual capacity and CITY OF RALEIGH
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
