Cases 71 - 80 of 774
Redd et al v. Covidien, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv11908
Plaintiff:
Melissa Redd and Douglas Redd
Defendant:
Covidien, Inc., Covidien LTD, Covidien PLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Garner v. Kidd et al
as 1:2022cv06270
Plaintiff:
James Garner
Defendant:
Thomas Costello, City Of Chicago, Hashtag Vision, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00900
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GRANT v. WARD et al
as 5:2022cv00396
Plaintiff:
DAYVON GRANT
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER TIMOTHY WARD, WARDEN ANNETTIA TOBY, DEREK HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redd v. Kijakazi
as 1:2022cv02710
Plaintiff:
Angela Yvette Redd
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
USA v. Alexis Rodgers
as 22-1951
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ALEXIS REDD RODGERS
Redd v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2022cv02712
Plaintiff:
Clenon Shernar Redd
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HARRIS-REDD v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv18212
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL DANGELO HARRIS-REDD
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
United States of America v. Shue
as 22-2013
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Eric Barbour, AKA E and Michael Redd
Defendant / Appellant:
Peter Shue
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC. et al v. EXTRAORDINARY CATERING, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv00671
Plaintiff:
BROADCAST MUSIC, INC., BEECHWOOD MUSIC CORPORATION, RICK SPRINGFIELD MUSIC and others
Defendant:
EXTRAORDINARY CATERING, LLC doing business as REDD'S ON UNION, JOSEF ALEXANDER, YASMINE ALEXANDER and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
