Cases 71 - 80 of 88
Hughes v. Holder et al
as 5:2011hc02073
Petitioner:
Randy Hughes
Respondent:
Eric Holder and Tracy Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Talamantes v. Jones
as 6:2011cv00091
Plaintiff:
Arturo Talamantes
Defendant:
Tracy Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Clayton v. Henry et al
as 5:2011cv00279
Plaintiff:
James E Clayton
Defendant:
Brad Henry, Mary Fallin, Justin Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Holder et al
as 3:2011cv03065
Plaintiff:
Randy Hughes
Defendant:
Eric Holder and Tracy Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jones et al v. Sandusky County, Ohio et al
as 3:2010cv02261
Defendant:
Sandusky County, Ohio, Sandusky County Board of Commissioners, Kyle Overmyer and others
Plaintiff:
Tracy Jones , Kim Jones and Estate of Bryan Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv03105
Plaintiff:
Tracy Jones, Tracy Jones, Tracy Jones and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Brad, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pip
Jones v. Pfizer Inc.
as 2:2010cv00128
Plaintiff:
Tracy Jones
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Jones v. Davol, Inc. et alDO NOT DOCKET. CASE HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED OUT.
as 0:2009cv03417
Plaintiff:
Tracy Jones, Tracy Jones, Tracy Jones and others
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Type:
Other Statutes
Abdul-Aziz Muhammad v. Lappin et al
as 09-7957
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, HAROLD WATTS, B. A. BLEDSOE and others
Collins et al v. Bustamante et al
as 1:2009cv00634
Plaintiff:
Mary Lou Collins, Mary Lou Collins, Lisa Jaramillo and others
Defendant:
Roger Bustamante, Helen Carr, Allen Cooper and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
