Cases
Cases 81 - 90 of 100
Bennett v. Top Shelf Home Advisors LLC
as 5:2026cv08337
Plaintiff: Steven Bennett
Defendant: Top Shelf Home Advisors LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00647
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Allen-El v. Arnold et al
as 1:2026cv03158
Plaintiff: Sup. Grand Emperor Michael Allen-El
Defendant: K. Arnold, R. Stottler, E. Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv10103
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
WALTERS et al v. MAYHALL et al
as 3:2026cv04912
Plaintiff: TERRY WALTERS and KRISTIE WALTERS
Defendant: CHARLES RAY MAYHALL and WILLIAM GANTT BENNETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv10103
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Linsey v. Bennett Motor Express, LLC et al
as 4:2026cv06466
Plaintiff: Eadie Linsey
Defendant: Bennett Motor Express, LLC and William Grachen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Gaustad, Nathan v. Dane County, Wisconsin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2026cv00736
Plaintiff: Nathan Gaustad
Defendant: Dane County, Wisconsin, Madison Police Department, Sheriff Mahala Gaillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kenneth Bennett v. Luis Irizarry
as 26-3001
Plaintiff: KENNETH BENNETT
Defendant: LUIS IRIZARRY
Waugh v. Eddy et al
as 5:2026cv05067
Plaintiff: Peter Waugh
Defendant: Wendy Eddy, Kai Shayler, Allan Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?