Cases 81 - 90 of 354
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv02910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hartsfield et al v. PepsiCo, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00379
Defendant:
PepsiCo, Inc., Morgan Olson, New Bern Transport Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Crystal Hartsfield, David Hartsfield, Kevon Hartsfield and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roberts et al v. Tumwater Police Department et al
as 3:2019cv06045
Defendant:
Yvonne Chase, Jacob Yancey, Tumwater Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn Roberts and Lehonna Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Norman Cady v. Costco Wholesale Corporation
as 5:2019cv02047
Defendant:
Does 1 to 25, inclusive and Costco Wholesale Corporation
Plaintiff:
Norman Cady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tennant et al v. Featherstone et al
as 4:2019cv04214
Defendant:
Mark Cady, Stephanie "the Hulk Rose, Brent Appel and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tennant and Kenneth Tennant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tennant et al v. Featherstone et al
as 3:2019cv00077
Defendant:
Mark Cady, Brent Appel, Paul Macek and others
Plaintiff:
Gregory Tennant, Kenneth Tennant, Kenneth C. Tennant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Conroy and Knowlton, Inc. v. Kevin Cady et al
as 2:2019cv08298
Defendant:
Does 1 through 50 inclusive and Kevin Cady
Plaintiff:
Conroy and Knowlton, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
United States of America v. Hamlett
as 19-3069
Defendant / Appellant:
Christopher Hamlett, AKA Cadi, AKA Cadillac Black
Not Yet Classified:
United States of America
Darryl Robinson v. Governor of Michigan, et al
as 19-1810
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES BUSH, Captain, TONY BAYNES, JOHN OCWIEJA and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DARRYL A. ROBINSON
Cady v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 2:2019cv03274
Plaintiff:
Jessica Leigh Cady
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
