Cases 81 - 90 of 104
Lewis v. Hobbs
as 5:2013cv00158
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis
Defendant:
Ray Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bounds et al v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2013cv00266
Plaintiff:
Michael Bounds , Forest Olivier , Wia Day and others
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, Minnesota State Patrol, Riccardo Munoz and others
Shakur v. Wetzel et al
as 1:2012cv02208
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis
Defendant:
John Wetzel, Tabb Bickell, R. Lawler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEIMER v. VANORSDALE et al
as 2:2012cv01586
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEWIS WEIMER
Defendant:
B. I. VANORSDALE and JOSEPH MANCHINI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Trustees of the Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Local Union No. 27 Welfare and Pension Funds v. Highland Glass, Inc. et al
as 1:2012cv06960
Plaintiff:
Trustees of the Glaziers, Architectural Metal and Glass Workers Local Union No. 27 Welfare and Pension Funds
Defendant:
Highland Glass, Inc. and Daniel Lewis
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
RE/MAX, LLC v. Southside Realty, Inc. et al
as 3:2012cv00499
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC
Defendant:
Southside Realty, Inc., Peter Janson and Daniel Lewis Jones
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051
Lewis v. Department of Homeland Security
as 2:2011cv02137
Plaintiff:
Danielle Lewis
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
King v. Levitz
as 8:2011cv02358
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lewis King
Defendant:
Dana Mark Levitz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WEIMER v. MANKAMYER et al
as 3:2011cv00105
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LEWIS WEIMER
Defendant:
SUSAN MANKAMYER and NORMAN A. KLAHRE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States v. Daniel Lee
as 11-1380
Plaintiff - Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
Daniel Lewis Lee, also known as Daniel Lewis Graham, also known as Danny Lee, also known as D L Graham
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
