Cases 1 - 10 of 3,748
Weeks v. Arkansas Division of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Paul Michael Weeks
Defendant:
Arkansas Division of Corrections, Thomas W Hurst, Brandon Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGhee v. Meaux et al
as 5:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Xavier McGhee
Defendant:
Chief Investigator Danny Meaux, Judge Robert Arnold, Attorney At Law Gus Sermos and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Villanueva et al v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00370
Plaintiff:
Quirino Villanueva, Alex Arnold, Samuel Jimenez-Perez and others
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Payne et al
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Keithen L Jones
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Dale Reed, Raymond Naylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguirre v. Securus Technology et al
as 6:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
Arnold Aguirre
Defendant:
Securus Technology, Ariel Burks, Unknown Pharr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ARNOLD v. USBOP
as 1:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS D. ARNOLD
Defendant:
USBOP STAFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Prisoner Bivens Action
Arnold Burk v. Catoosa County Superior Court
as 24-11171
Petitioner:
ARNOLD CORDELL BURK
Respondent:
CATOOSA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Arnold Burk v. Catoosa County Superior Court
as 24-11170
Plaintiff:
ARNOLD CORDELL BURK
Defendant:
CATOOSA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT
Arnold v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
Antonio Arnold
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
