Cases 1 - 10 of 2,648
Wilson v. McCall
as 3:2024cv00456
Plaintiff:
Jonathan R. Wilson
Defendant:
Leonard McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blaylock #895020 v. Burgess et al
as 1:2024cv00593
Plaintiff:
James Blaylock #895020
Defendant:
M. Burgess, J. Clouse, Unknown Snay and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Everett v. McCall
as 4:2024cv00107
Plaintiff:
Steven Everett
Defendant:
Wyatt McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Albert Anderson v. Reep
as 24-6339
Plaintiff:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant:
REEP, Warden, DOUG NEWTON, Warden, FOOTHILLS CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, Prison and others
Turner v. McCall
as 7:2024cv00351
Plaintiff:
Brian Turner
Defendant:
Matt McCall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCall v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00030
Plaintiff:
Melisa Diane McCall
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Isbill v. Stitt, et al
as 24-6064
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WILLIAM ISBILL
Defendant:
KEVIN STITT, Governor, LARRY MORRIS, Pardon & parole Board member, ADAM LUCK, Pardon & parole Board member and others
US v. Shanena McCall
as 24-4276
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
SHANENA INEZ MCCALL, a/k/a Chubbs
McCall v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv02143
Plaintiff:
KERRY MCCALL
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Students for Justice in Palestine, at the University of Houston et al v. Abbott et al
as 1:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Students for Justice in Palestine, at the University of Houston, Students for Justice in Palestine, at the University of Texas at Dallas and Democratic Socialists of America
Defendant:
Greg Abbott, University of Houston, University of Houston System Board of Regents and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
