Cases 1 - 10 of 9,163
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00266
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12102 Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA")
Sellers v. Scott County Detention Center
as 3:2024cv00245
Plaintiff:
Zachary Wade Sellers
Defendant:
Scott County Detention Center
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Damond v. City of Rayville
as 24-30289
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
City of Rayville, Gary Gilley, Individually & in his Official Capacity, Tyler Wade, in his Individual Capacity & Official Capacity and others
Wade v. L'Oreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv03534
Plaintiff:
Lukesha Wade
Defendant:
L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products, Inc., SoftSheen-Carson LLC, and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Reller v. Winch et al
as 5:2024cv05029
Plaintiff:
Dustin Reller
Defendant:
Donell Winch, Robert Yantis, Wade Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-5049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Tavron v. Payne et al
as 2:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Marques Tavron
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Mose Jackson, III, M Richarson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Simpson v. Hefner et al
as 1:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Preston Wade Simpson
Defendant:
Carl Hefner, Jimmy Kirkman and Chris Cross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gardner et al v. Caridi et al
as 1:2024cv03122
Plaintiff:
Philip Gardner, Patrick Wade and Craft House, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael Caridi, Vincent Lima, Sean Torres and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
