Cases 41 - 50 of 14,512
Massey v. State of Missouri et al
as 6:2024cv03121
Plaintiff:
Jesse Leonard Massey
Defendant:
State of Missouri, Springfield Police Department and multiple unknown officers, City of Springfield, Missouri and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wall v. Koellien
as 3:2024cv00484
Plaintiff:
James Brent Wall
Defendant:
Deputy f/n/u Koellien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hatchett v. Mercy Medical Hospital et al
as 1:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gerard Hatchett
Defendant:
Mercy Medical Hospital, Dr Kemp, R/N Amanda Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rotondo v. Salisbury, et al
as 24-1358
Plaintiff:
GINO ROTONDO, SR.
Defendant:
WAYNE T. SALISBURY, JR., individial capacity, KIMBERLY KANE, individual capacity, LORI VENTITUOLO, individual capacity and others
Millsaps v. King et al
as 4:2024cv00341
Plaintiff:
Travon D Higgins
Defendant:
Ashley N King, Corey Haynie, JD Wheatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Higgins v. King et al
as 4:2024cv00340
Plaintiff:
Travon D Higgins
Defendant:
Ashley N King, Corey Haynie, JD Wheatley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Tarvin et al v. Cobble et al
as 3:2024cv00465
Plaintiff:
Corey D. Tarvin and Annie Barnes
Defendant:
Brett Cobble and f/n/u Higdon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02869
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
HATTON v. WARDEN
as 1:2024cv00668
Petitioner:
TIMOTHY N. HATTON
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. TERRA et al
as 2:2024cv01610
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA TAYLOR JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOSEPH TERRA, CO 2 BANGER, CO 1 CALLOWAY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
