Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 93,372
Abramson
as 2:2024mc50487
HOUCK et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2024cv02151
Plaintiff: MARK HOUCK and RYAN-MARIE HOUCK
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, MICHAEL ROGERS, JUAN BARRIOS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Pentkowski et al v. Bexar County et al
as 5:2024cv00524
Petitioner: Amy Pentkowski, Mark Pentkowski and Annette Bleech
Respondent: Bexar County and City of San Antonio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Ellis v. Does
as 4:2024cv00450
Plaintiff: Corey L Ellis
Defendant: Does Mark/Scott, Owners, Loose Change Coin Laundry; Ty, Loose Change Coin Laundry; Employee, Loose Change Coin Laundry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murdoch v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration et al
as 5:2024cv00509
Plaintiff: Mark H Murdoch
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Williams v Wyoming Governor et al
as 1:2024cv00104
Defendant: Wyoming Governor, Gillette Mayor, Former Gillette City Attorney and others
Plaintiff: Bruce B Williams and The Hypatian Society
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
National Association for Gun Rights, et al v. Polis
as 24-1209
Plaintiff: NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR GUN RIGHTS, CHRISTOPHER JAMES HIESTAND RICHARDSON, MAX EDWIN SCHLOSSER and others
Defendant: JARED POLIS, in his official capacity as Governor of the State of Colorado,
In re: Mark Christopherson
as 24-175
Petitioner: In re: MARK TODD CHRISTOPHERSON
Randy Rindahl v. Tim Reisch, et al
as 24-2033
Plaintiff: Randy Rindahl
Defendant: Kimberley Malsam-Rysdon, Ex-Secretary of Health, Joan Adam, Interim Secretary of Health, Kristi Noem, Governor for the State of South Dakota and others
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff: JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant: JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?