Cases 41 - 50 of 3,763
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00778
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
United States of America v. Diallo
as 24-1255
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AMADOU KANE DIALLO
GARLAND v. NEWMAN ET AL
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
RANDOLPH WAYNE GARLAND
Defendant:
HANCOCK COUNTY JAIL, CHRISTINA NEWMAN, SCOTT KANE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Laurence, Jr. v. Nerohna et al
as 1:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Norman Laurence, Jr.
Defendant:
Peter F Nerohna, Wayne T. Salisbury Jr., Rachel C. Bray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
STA Group LLC v. Motorola Solutions Inc et al
as 2:2024mc00002
Plaintiff:
STA Group LLC
Petitioner:
Motorola Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Jeff Lucas, Peter Fritz, Dillon Kane Group and others
Respondent:
Wes Wells and Steve Spanglo
Kane v. Haynes et al
as 2:2024cv00013
Plaintiff:
Ali Kane and Abdoulaye Toumbou
Defendant:
Ronald Haynes, William Stockwell and Chlarson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Kane Youngman
as 24-1369
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kane Youngman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Brian Kane, et al v. U.S. Attorney General, et al
as 23-14192
Plaintiff:
BRIAN PATRICK KANE, ZAYNE ANEED ELIAS OTERO, CAMILO ANDRES OROZCO ELIAS and others
Defendant:
U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, DIRECTOR, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, ASSOCIATE DIRECTOR SERVICE CENTER OPERATIONS DIRECTORATE, U.S. CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION SERVICES and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
