Cases 1 - 10 of 21
USA v. Ahamefule Odus
as 24-10980
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
AHAMEFULE ASO ODUS
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Lester v. Ojo et al
as 5:2023ct03363
Plaintiff:
Andre Eugene Lester
Defendant:
A. Odu, N. Harris, J. Ray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ODU v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
as 1:2022cv10252
Plaintiff:
TUNDE ODU
Defendant:
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and Michael McCleary
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
David Meyers v. Ivan Gilmore
as 21-6674
Defendant / Appellee:
WARDEN IVAN GILMORE, Chief Warden, COUNSELOR R. BRITT, ANGELA WETHINGTON, Operations Manager/PREA Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Ross v. Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V. et al
as 2:2016cv13468
Plaintiff:
Odus E. Ross
Defendant:
Fiat Chrysler Automobiles N.V., Sergio Marchionne, Richard K. Palmer and others
Movant:
Richard Champagne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00170
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Jefferson v. Portside Care Center, LLC et al
as 6:2012cv00792
Plaintiff:
Pamlian Jefferson
Defendant:
Portside Care Center, LLC , Bayside Care Center, Inc. , Stephen Odu and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2011cv00829
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00020
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Chimeniem Echendu v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 11-50968
Petitioner - Appellant:
CHIMENIUM ODU ECHENDU
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
