Cases 21 - 30 of 5,957
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Garcia, et al. v. City of Tustin, et al.
as 24-2224
Plaintiff:
EMILY GARCIA and C.G., by and through her guardian ad litem, Rosalia Becerra
Defendant:
CITY OF TUSTIN and ESTELLA SILVA
Robinson v. Silva et al
as 3:2024cv02154
Plaintiff:
Calvin Maron Robinson
Defendant:
Phillipe Silva, Quines, III, Sgt. Reynoso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
David Ratcliff v. Darlene Tyler, et al
as 24-11096
Plaintiff:
DAVID MARC RATCLIFF
Defendant:
DARLENE TYLER, CARLOS SILVA, UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
STIER, ESQ v. POSSEBON et al
as 3:2024cv04647
Defendant:
TW BRASIL LTDA, EMPIRE STRONG INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS INTERMEDIATION, LLC, DIEGO POSSEBON and others
Plaintiff:
EDWIN H. STIER, ESQ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
NELSON v. LAUREL et al
as 1:2024cv00099
Plaintiff:
BRIAN NELSON
Defendant:
SECRETARY HARRY LAUREL, JORGE DOMINICIS, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Reynolds v. FTE Networks, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00916
Plaintiff:
Cathy Reynolds
Defendant:
FTE Networks, Inc., US Home Rentals, LLC, Vision Property Management, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment
Nunes Dos Santos, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2115
Petitioner:
PAULO RICARDO NUNES DOS SANTOS, ISLANNA KYVIA SOUZA DA SILVA and CARLOS RICARDO NUNES DA SILVA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
SILVA v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 2:2024cv04562
Plaintiff:
JOAO M. SILVA
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
US v. Gomes Da Silva
as 24-1308
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant:
WALTER GOMES DA SILVA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
