Cases 1 - 10 of 994
Henderson v. McMahan et al
as 3:2024cv00319
Plaintiff:
Ernest Henderson
Defendant:
Judge Teresa McMahan, Judge Jennifer E. Porter, Judge Deborah Lewis Shaw and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Styles et al v. The Bank of Missouri et al
as 3:2024cv03137
Plaintiff:
Auria Styles, Tynia Baisden, Chilette Brown and others
Defendant:
The Bank of Missouri, First Electronic Bank, Concora Credit Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
David v. Whittaker
as 3:2024cv00699
Plaintiff:
Amanda David
Defendant:
Robert Whittaker, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Fair Housing Act
Whittaker v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02716
Plaintiff:
Donald Whittaker
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Whittaker v. USA
as 3:2024cv00833
Petitioner:
Chandler B. Whittaker
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Whittaker v. United States of America
as 9:2024cv00624
Petitioner:
Chandler B. Whittaker
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Whittaker v. Owens et al
as 4:2024cv00565
Plaintiff:
Robert Whittaker
Defendant:
Dr. Shannon K. Owens, Dale Glass, Unknown Frazier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Whittaker
as 24-2064
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
RICHARD WHITTAKER
Littleton v. Hudson et al
as 4:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Ricky James Littleton, Jr
Defendant:
Shirley Hudson, K Washington and Whittaker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson et al v. Parson et al
as 4:2024cv00174
Plaintiff:
Barbara Johnson, Nicole Price, Narene Crosby and others
Defendant:
Michael L. Parson, Andrew Bailey, Jay Ashcroft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
