Cases 41 - 50 of 319
Bluford v. Hendrix et al
as 3:2022cv01005
Plaintiff:
Derek Bluford
Defendant:
Warden DeWayne Hendrix, A.W. R. Bills, Mrs. Bunsel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Corbin v. Brown et al
as 5:2022cv00160
Petitioner:
Gregory Izear Corbin
Respondent:
A.W. Brown, Complex and Warden S. Lovett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Frick v. Dy et al
as 2:2022cv00801
Plaintiff:
Christopher Frick and Christerfer A Frick
Defendant:
United States of America, Federal Detention Center - SeaTac, Dy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Allen v. Harris et al
as 1:2022cv00688
Plaintiff:
Anthony L. Allen, Jr.
Defendant:
A.W. Harris, Montgomery, Anda and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DURANT v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2022cv01152
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL A DURANT
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, I.Y.C. PRISON AND STAFF and A.W.-ALSTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Brooks et al
as 3:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
Osvaldo Jose Garcia
Defendant:
Radford S Brooks, J.D. Brooks, T.R. Yeagar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Nelson et al
as 8:2022cv01467
Plaintiff:
Dantlee A. Smith
Defendant:
Warden Kenneth Nelson, Cpt. Tony Vela, Major Kenneth Greggs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Carpenter v. Ponds
as 1:2022cv00012
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Carpenter
Defendant:
A.W. Ponds
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Gant v. Sean Marler, et al
as 22-1396
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH GANT
Defendant / Appellee:
SEAN MARLER, Warden, MRS. KNOX, A.W., MARISSA NASH and others
Parks v. Boyd et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parks, Jr.
Defendant:
Bert Boyd, A.W. Cobble, Cutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
