Cases 41 - 50 of 79
Gilliana v. Watson et al
as 4:2015cv00283
Plaintiff:
Alexander G Gilliana
Defendant:
Randy Watson , M Malone , Amanda King and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Covey v. Select Portfolio Serving, Inc.
as 5:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Alexander G. Covey
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. $36,750 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
as 1:2015cv00084
Defendant:
$36,750 UNITED STATES CURRENCY
Interested Party:
BMW Financial Services NA, LLC
Claimant:
ALEXANDER G PEACOCK
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 781 Forfeiture
Anghel v. Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C.
as 14-1127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Maria-Lucia Anghel, M.D.
Defendant - Appellee:
Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., Douglas Jay Good and Alexander G. Bateman, Jr.
Anghel v. Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C. et al
as 1:2014cv00061
Plaintiff:
Maria Lucia Anghel
Defendant:
Ruskin Moscou Faltischek, P.C., Alexander G. Bateman and Douglas J. Good
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
G., et al v. Town of Alton, et al
as 1:2011cv00571
Defendant:
Alton, Town of, Edward Correia, Tyler Hackett and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander G. and Robert G.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
KEATON v. FOLINO et al
as 2:2011cv07225
Petitioner:
ALEXANDER G. KEATON
Respondent:
LOUIS FOLINO, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv08018
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 157
BROSSEUK v. AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.
as 2:2011cv52482
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER G. BROSSEUK
Defendant:
AMERICAN PRESIDENT LINES LTD.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
