Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Simpson v. Saul We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2020cv00186
Plaintiff: Gary Allen Simpson
Defendant: Commissioner Andrew Saul and Andrew Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Simpson et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2019cv00634
Defendant: Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff: Ronnie Allen Simpson and Taralyn Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Valdez v. Simpson We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 0:2018cv00051
Plaintiff: Reanna Valdez
Defendant: Allen Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00097
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Allen Simpson v. Dean Dove, Warden
as 16-31142
Petitioner - Appellant: ALLEN SIMPSON
Respondent - Appellee: DEAN DOVE, Warden, Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
Simpson et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 2:2015cv12663
Plaintiff: Laurie N. Simpson and Allen Simpson
Defendant: Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
SIMPSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as NJ/3:15-cv-06004
Plaintiff: LAURIE N. SIMPSON and ALLEN SIMPSON
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC
SIMPSON et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2015cv06004
Plaintiff: LAURIE N. SIMPSON and ALLEN SIMPSON
Defendant: JOHNSON & JOHNSON and ETHICON, INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Allen v. Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
as 3:2014cv00723
Defendant: Warden Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
Plaintiff: Allen Simpson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Allen v. Natchitoches Parish Detention Center We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2014cv02523
Plaintiff: Allen Simpson
Defendant: Warden Natchitoches Parish Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?