Cases 1 - 10 of 18
DELUCA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv11352
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS ANTHONY DELUCA
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Giattina v. Ouachita County, Arkansas et al
as 1:2021cv01047
Plaintiff:
Timothy Giattina
Defendant:
Ouachita County, Arkansas, Tiffany Kinley, Cameron Owens and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
THOMPSON v. DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE et al
as 2:2021cv01252
Plaintiff:
LYNNE L. THOMPSON
Defendant:
ALLEGHENY COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, STEVEN ZAPPALA, RICHARD BYERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carswell et al v. Donda Enterprises LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00612
Plaintiff:
Anthony Deluca, Jennifer Dillon and Kimillia Carswell
Defendant:
Ansuya Patel and Donda Enterprises LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv01049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Deluca v. United States of America
as 9:2016cv80899
Plaintiff:
James Anthony Deluca, III
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
DELUCA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2015cv08650
Petitioner:
ANTHONY DELUCA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
USA v. Jason Deluca
as 15-10879
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JASON ANTHONY DELUCA
David Barren v. Pennsylvania State Police, et al
as 14-4221
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MORRIS BARREN
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, TROOPER WESLEY BERKEBILE, TROOPER SERGEANT ANTHONY DELUCA and others
BARREN v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE et al
as 3:2014cv00134
Plaintiff:
DAVID MORRIS BARREN
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA STATE POLICE, TROOPER WESLEY BERKEBILE, TROOPER SERGEANT ANTHONY DELUCA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
