Cases 1 - 10 of 92
Davis v. Phoenix Federal Correctional Institution et al
as 2:2026cv04596
Plaintiff:
Aaron Davis
Defendant:
Phoenix Federal Correctional Institution, Unknown Gunther, Unknown Bumgarner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ogan v. City of Morristown, Tennessee et al
as 2:2026cv00132
Plaintiff:
Kayden Slade Ogan
Defendant:
City of Morristown, Tennessee, Joseph Sutton, Aaron Davis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv02780
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Aaron Davis v. Tyler Duncan, et al
as 26-3013
Plaintiff:
AARON DAVIS
Defendant:
TYLER W.A. DUNCAN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as an employee of the Multi-County Correctional Facility, DALE R. OSBORN, Individually and in his Official Capacity as Executive Director of the Multi-County Corrrectional Facility, BRANDON TAYLOR, Individually and in his Official Capacity as an employee of the Multi-County Correctional Facility and others
Acosta et al v. AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv11940
Plaintiff:
Emilia Acosta, Maria Acosta, Shirley Adams and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation, Archroma U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix
as 2:2025cv02580
Plaintiff:
Aaron Davis
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Institution - Phoenix
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Nocco
as 8:2025cv01738
Plaintiff:
Matthew Aaron Davis
Defendant:
Christopher Nocco
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Toczylowski
as 8:2025cv01704
Plaintiff:
Matthew Aaron Davis
Defendant:
Michael A. Toczylowski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
