Cases 1 - 10 of 988
FLYNN v. ACTING WARDEN OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 2:2024cv00617
Petitioner:
KELSIE GENE FLYNN
Respondent:
ACTING WARDEN OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY JAIL and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ALLEGHENY COUNTY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Noble v. Napier
as 24-1377
Petitioner:
THOMAS E. NOBLE
Respondent:
STEPHANIE NAPIER, Acting Warden, FMC Devens
Alli v. Sterling et al
as 1:2024cv02734
Plaintiff:
Umar Alli
Defendant:
Sterling, Edmund, Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lloyd v. Mackey
as 1:2024cv00622
Petitioner:
Cronie Lloyd
Respondent:
Acting Warden Misty Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brent Nash v. A. Bryce, et al
as 24-1263
Plaintiff:
BRENT JAMES NASH
Defendant:
A. BRYCE, Correctional Officer, official and personal capacity, C. TURNER, Correctional Officer, official and personal capacity, BECKY CARL, Acting warden, official and personal capacity and others
Rafael Bean v. Nathan Hoffman
as 24-1220
Petitioner:
RAFAEL VERNIER BEAN
Respondent:
NATHAN HOFFMAN, Acting Warden
George v. Allen
as 5:2024cv01422
Petitioner:
Keenan George
Respondent:
Acting Warden Trent Allen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Deputy Divison Director et al
as 4:2024cv00344
Plaintiff:
Juan Vasquez Brown
Defendant:
Deputy Division Director, Grievance Officer, Property Room Staff Sergent and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frantz v. State of Kansas, et al
as 24-3032
Plaintiff:
BARBARA FRANTZ
Defendant:
STATE OF KANSAS, JEFF ZMUDA, Secretary of Corrections, GLORIA GEITHER, Warden, Topeka correctional facility and others
Derrick Brown, Jr. v. Misty Mackey
as 24-3157
Petitioner:
DERRICK L. BROWN, JR.
Respondent:
MISTY MACKEY, Acting Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
