Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Taylor v. Dunklin County et al
as 1:2024cv00036
Plaintiff:
J. W. Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
Dunklin County, State of Missouri, Steven Geary and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAY v. 3M COMPANY
as 7:2023cv02513
Plaintiff:
NATHAN ALEXANDER RAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Thomas #571060 v. Fox et al
as 1:2022cv01038
Plaintiff:
Kevin Thomas #571060, Jr.
Defendant:
Alexander Ray Fox and Angela Moblo Curtis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Ray v. Norwood et al
as 6:2022cv00196
Plaintiff:
Raymond Alexander Ray
Defendant:
Joe Norwood, Julia Dorman, Airnesto Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv38302
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER RAY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ray v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
as 5:2021cv00694
Petitioner:
Raymond Alexander Ray
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RAY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv44123
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH ALEXANDER RAY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
STRAND v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv91795
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER RAY STRAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
PEDROZA v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv29239
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ALEXANDER RAY PEDROZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ray v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections
as 5:2020cv00078
Petitioner:
Raymond Alexander Ray
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
