Cases 1 - 10 of 52
Johnson v. Hinds County Sheriff Department
as 3:2022cv00715
Plaintiff:
Allen Johnson, Jr.
Defendant:
Hinds County Sheriff Department
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Johnson v. USA
as 1:2022cv00057
Petitioner:
Mark Allen Johnson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Johnson #094153 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2020cv02347
Plaintiff:
Gerald Allen Johnson
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Party and Unknown Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McClain et al v. Guider et al
as 3:2020cv00328
Defendant:
Investigator Kentner, Cody Fritz, Cpl Cathy and others
Plaintiff:
Manford W Meadows, Jr, Walter Smith, Christopher Allen Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Hinds County et al
as 3:2019cv00761
Defendant:
M.W 5530 Mike Worten, AB 3167 Andrew Baldwin, Sheriff Victor Mason and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Allen Johnson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lacefield v. Helder et al
as 5:2019cv05143
Defendant:
Sheriff Tim Helder, Major Randall Denzer and Captain Allen Johnson
Plaintiff:
Joseph Thomas Lacefield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Holland et al
as 4:2019cv00139
Defendant:
Walker County Sheriff Department, Officer J. Holland, Walker County Sheriff's Office and others
Plaintiff:
James Allen Johnson and James A. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Barnhart
as 6:2019cv00129
Respondent:
J. A. Barnhart
Petitioner:
Walter Allen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Johnson v. Farris et al
as 2:2019cv00115
Defendant:
Ken Stolle, M. Farris and Naph Care Inc.
Plaintiff:
Alexander Allen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv02069
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
