Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Abdall Ziadah et al v. AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc. et al
as 2:2025cv11947
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Abdall Ziadah, Edward Altman, Ian Anderson and others
Defendant:
AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc., Amerex Corporation, Archroma U.S., Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Johnson et al v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2025cv11609
Plaintiff:
Shamara Johnson, Spirit Johnson, Stacia Johnson and others
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Tharp et al v. Palco Inc
as 4:2021cv00341
Plaintiff:
Rithea Neal, John Gardner, Burna Tharp and others
Defendant:
Palco Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Miller v. Payne et al
as 2:2020cv00191
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Jacqueline Love-Craft, Christopher Budnick and others
Plaintiff:
Keet Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00059
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Adams v. Trump et al
as 2:2018cv10133
Defendant:
Stephen A. Smith, Ryan Friedlinghaus, Mario Lemieux and others
Plaintiff:
Jerome S. Adams
Jordan v. Berryhill
as 7:2017cv00059
Plaintiff:
Andre Jordan
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Jordan v. AbbVie Inc et al
as 1:2015cv10082
Plaintiff:
Andre Jordan
Defendant:
AbbVie Inc, Abbott Laboratories, AbbVie Products LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv00030
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
USA v. Johnson
as 06-60303
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ANDRE JORDAN JOHNSON, also known as Byrd
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
