Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Huff v. Loreal USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv06228
Plaintiff:
LaTeisha Ann Huff
Defendant:
Loreal USA, Inc., Revlon Group Holdings LLC, Luster Products, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Huff v. Kijakazi
as 1:2023cv01540
Plaintiff:
Margaret Ann Huff
Defendant:
Dr. Kilolo Kijakazi
Interested Party:
SSA Notify and Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sandra Ann Huff v. Kilolo Kijakazi
as 2:2023cv02615
Plaintiff:
Sandra Ann Huff
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Huff v. Saul
as 1:2020cv01347
Interested Party:
SSA Notify
Plaintiff:
Margaret Ann Huff
Defendant:
Andrew M. Saul
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Huff-Rousselle v. Internal Revenue Service
as 1:2019cv10293
Defendant:
Internal Revenue Service
Plaintiff:
Margaret Ann Huff-Rousselle
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Huff v. Kaskie et al
as 1:2018cv00462
Plaintiff:
Carol Ann Huff
Defendant:
Kevin John Kaskie and Paper Transport, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Huff v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv00958
Plaintiff:
Margaret Ann Huff
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Martinez v. Santamaria
as 16-3803
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Juan Ramon Martinez
Defendant - Appellee:
Adult Career and Continuing Education Service, Isabel Gonzalez, Ann Huff and others
Defendant:
Elsie Santamaria, ferrai Driving School Program Manerger, D. Pinto, Ferrari driving school, Inc. president and owner, Adriana Tortorello and others
Huff v. Colvin
as 4:2016cv00938
Plaintiff:
Stacy Ann Huff
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Huff et al v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2016cv02341
Plaintiff:
Julia Ann Huff and Othel Dayle Huff
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
