Cases 1 - 10 of 55
T-Mobile USA, Inc. v. Anthony Dale, et al
as 24-8013
Petitioner:
T-MOBILE USA, INC.
Respondent:
ANTHONY DALE, BRETT JACKSON, JOHNNA FOX and others
Farr v. Marshall et al
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dale Farr
Defendant:
William Marshall, Pruntytown Correctional Center, Psimed Corrections, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Farr v. Marshall et al
as 5:2023cv00317
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dale Farr
Defendant:
William Marshall, WV Division of Corrections and Rehabilitation, Pruntytown Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martinson v. Kijakazi
as 0:2023cv00178
Plaintiff:
Anthony Martinson and Anthony Dale Martinson
Defendant:
Kilolo, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Kijakazi and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
US v. Anthony Leichter
as 22-4677
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ANTHONY DALE LEICHTER
ROSEMAN v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2022cv23065
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DALE ROSEMAN
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dale et al v. Deutsche Telekom AG et al
as 1:2022cv03189
Plaintiff:
Anthony Dale, Brett Jackson, Johnna Fox and others
Defendant:
Deutsche Telekom AG, T-Mobile US, Inc. and Softbank Group Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Williams v. Hibbett Inc et al
as 3:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
Latasha Williams
Defendant:
Hibbett Inc, Hibbett Retail Inc, Hibbett Wholesale Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
TILFORD v. BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL
as 1:2021cv02836
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DALE TILFORD
Defendant:
BARTHOLOMEW COUNTY JAIL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv68165
Plaintiff:
ANTHONY DALE JOHNSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
