Cases 1 - 10 of 11
WOOD v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2023cv13174
Plaintiff:
APRIL WOOD
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC, LTL MANAGEMENT, LLC and others
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES, AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Woods v. Absolute Total Care, Inc.
as 0:2022cv01870
Plaintiff:
April Woods
Defendant:
Absolute Total Care, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Bishop v. Funderburk et al
as 3:2021cv00679
Plaintiff:
Dan Bishop
Defendant:
Amy L Funderburk, Paul Newby, Robin Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00962
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Panetta v. Cassel et al
as 1:2020cv02255
Defendant:
Christopher Dinapoli, Anthony Grosso, Mountain Rottie Rescue of New York, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Panetta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Woods v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv04186
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
April Woods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood v. Pinnacle Highbury Apartments et al
as 2:2017cv01232
Plaintiff:
April Wood
Defendant:
Pinnacle Highbury Apartments and Ashley Burrola
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 3601
Morrow v. Wood et al
as 1:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
Richard W. Morrow
Defendant:
April Wood, Trent Kelly and Joe Caldwell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Wood et al v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv28229
Plaintiff:
April Wood and Randall Wood
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. , Ethicon, LLC , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wood v. Nwachuku
as 2:2010cv01067
Plaintiff:
April Wood
Defendant:
Victor Nwachuku
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
