Cases 91 - 100 of 967
Rafalko v. Garrido
as 4:2023cv00189
Petitioner:
Anthony Rafalko
Respondent:
BOP and Freddy Garrido
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Aigbekaen v. USA et al
as 3:2023cv00542
Plaintiff:
Raymond Aigbekaen
Defendant:
USA, Merrick Garland, BOP Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Demenia Hawkins v. BOP
as 2:2023cv01202
Petitioner:
Demenia Hawkins
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Cobble v. US Government et al
as 6:2023cv00648
Plaintiff:
Daniel Cobble, Johnathan Wayne Plemons, Daniel Castleberry and others
Defendant:
US Government, US BOP, US BOP Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, Federal Filers (Bivens)
Simon v. BOP Allenwood Low
as 1:2023cv00256
Petitioner:
Daryl Simon
Respondent:
BOP Allenwood Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
AIGBEKAEN v. HIGHTOWER, et al.
as 3:2023cv00019
Petitioner:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Respondent:
WARDEN HIGHTOWER, DR. RABINOWITZ, HSA and others
Defendant:
LT. FRIEND, ONE UNKNOWN CORRECTIONS OFFICER, MR. VINGLASS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Mark Stinson, Sr. v. J. Dorsey, et al
as 23-5087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARK T. STINSON, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
J. DORSEY, BOP Officer and UNKNOWN SUPERIOR OFFICERS
PULLIAM v. USA
as 1:2023cv00085
Petitioner:
JODY LEE PULLIAM, JR.
Respondent:
BOP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Block v. Fikes et al
as 0:2023cv00192
Plaintiff:
Waylen Block
Defendant:
J Fikes, Acting Warden, Amy Boucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Block v. Boncher et al
as 1:2023cv10141
Plaintiff:
Waylen Block
Defendant:
Amy Boncher, Sincada, Hansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
