Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04627
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 8 U.S.C. § 1105 (a) Aliens: Habeas Corpus to Release INS Det
Gilliam v. Smith et al
as 2:2026cv00105
Plaintiff:
Alonzo Gilliam, III
Defendant:
Smith, Brawley Stanley, Victor Teague and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kranz #803848 v. Staelens et al
as 1:2026cv01972
Plaintiff:
Earl Robert Kranz #803848
Defendant:
Unknown Staelens, Unknown Hudson, Steven Cook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv03668
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Villanueva-Rivera v. Brawley
as 1:2026cv00207
Petitioner:
Jose Guadalup Villanueva-Rivera
Respondent:
J Brawley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Lakhani v. Brawley
as 1:2026cv00177
Petitioner:
Rahman Lakhani
Respondent:
J. Brawley, Warden, FCI Big Spring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lakhani v. Brawley
as 7:2026cv00144
Defendant:
Rahman Lakhani
Respondent:
J. Brawley, Warden, FCI Big Spring
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brawley v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2026cv00060
Plaintiff:
Jeana Rena Brawley
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration - Interested Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bustos-Padilla v. Brawley
as 1:2026cv00128
Plaintiff:
Israel Bustos-Padilla
Defendant:
FNU Brawley and Natalie Wright
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
