Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Breedlove v. Lane et al
as 6:2026cv01267
Plaintiff:
Crystal Gaylinn Breedlove
Defendant:
Robert Lane and Lane Enterprises, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Kennedy v. Ellisson et al
as 7:2026cv00658
Plaintiff:
Daniel Lee Kennedy
Defendant:
Officer Ellisson, Captain Miller, Officer Tyree and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abdur-Rahman et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2026cv05288
Plaintiff:
Deidhra Abdur-Rahman, Chris B Acker, Rafael Acosta and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Shutes v. Breedlove et al
as 4:2026cv00548
Plaintiff:
Travis Shutes
Defendant:
Breedlove and WellPath
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
State of Wisconsin v. Johnson, Sr., John et al
as 3:2026cv00401
Plaintiff:
State of Wisconsin
Defendant:
John D. Johnson, Sr., George Thompson, Gloria Cobb and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dionte Breedlove v. USA
as 26-5324
Petitioner:
DIONTE L. BREEDLOVE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Breedlove v. Breedlove et al
as 3:2026cv00831
Plaintiff:
William O. Breedlove, III
Defendant:
Corine Breedlove and Alex A. Bonnet
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
David Meyers v. J. Artrip
as 26-6282
Plaintiff:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant:
J. ARTRIP, Wallens Ridge State Prison Warden, J. BLEVINS, T. HALL and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
BARBOSA v. WALTON COUNTY et al
as 3:2026cv01209
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO CESAR BARBOSA
Defendant:
WALTON COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, DAVID BENNETT, HATSADY SIRIPHOKHA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
