Cases 21 - 30 of 105
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. RENEW FORESTRY GROUP, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00081
Defendant:
RENEW DEVELOPMENT GROUP, LLLP, RENEW HOLDINGS, LLC, BRIAN A. MILLER and others
Plaintiff:
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv02339
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN EDWARD MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sammons v. McCarty, et al
as 1:2020cv03010
Plaintiff:
Vincent S Sammons
Defendant:
Deborah Sniadowki, Alfred C. Wein, Jr., Jason L. Allison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAKER v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al
as 4:2020cv00335
Defendant:
WAKULLA COUNTY JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, RONALD W FLURY, STATE OF FLORIDA and others
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN H RAKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MILLER v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv92866
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
BRIAN CHRISTOPHER MILLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00409
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
SHARP v. MILLER et al
as 4:2020cv00074
Plaintiff:
KEITH MAURICE SHARP
Defendant:
L KEEN, BRENT X THURMOND, ASHLEY MOODY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantrell v. Baker et al
as 1:2019cv00044
Defendant:
Baker, Daniel Golden, Wendy Kelley and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmy Shane Cantrell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nooner v. Bryant et al
as 1:2019cv01014
Defendant:
Stacey Pectol, J. Leon Holmes, Sue Newberry and others
Plaintiff:
Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nooner v. Miller et al
as 4:2019cv00210
Defendant:
Harry F Barnes, Eastern District of Arkansas, James R Marschewjki and others
Petitioner:
Terrick Nooner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
