Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Powell v. Kinsley et al
as 2:2012cv00372
Plaintiff:
Clinton R. Powell
Defendant:
Dana Y. Kinsley, Ronald Abernathy, Benjamin Wright and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lord Versatile v. Gene Johnson
as 12-6211
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LORD VERSATILE, a/k/a Venson Leon Coward
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Director Virginia DOC, JOHN JABE, Deputy Director of Operations, BENJAMIN WRIGHT, Chairman Publication Review Board and others
X v. United States Congress et al
as 3:2012cv00045
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee X
Defendant:
United States Congress, Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold E. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
X v. United States Congress et al
as 3:2011cv00781
Plaintiff:
Johnathan Lee X
Defendant:
United States Congress, Virginia Department of Corrections, Harold E. Clarke and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prison Legal News, Inc. v. Johnson
as 3:2009cv00068
Plaintiff:
Prison Legal News, Inc. and Prison Legal News, Inc.
Defendant:
Gene M. Johnson, John M. Jabe, W. D. Jennings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Ludwick
as 2:2009cv11886
Petitioner:
Benjamin Wright
Respondent:
Nick Ludwick
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Cheryl Jones v. Vernon Beatty
as 09-1484
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHERYL J. JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
VERNON D. BEATTY, BRENDA LYLES, CHIEF FISCHER and others
Jones v. Beatty et al
as 7:2009cv00535
Plaintiff:
Cheryl J Jones
Defendant:
Vernon D Beatty, Brenda Lyles, FNU Fischer and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Wright v. Lane et al
as 1:2008cv00040
Plaintiff:
James Benjamin Wright
Defendant:
Brandon K Lane, Curtis Mienzer, Eddie Selvey and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
WRIGHT V DVA
as 07-7247
Claimant-Appellant:
Benjamin Wright, Jr.
Appellee:
Gordon H. Mansfield, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
