Cases 1 - 10 of 539
Black v. Adolf et al
as 5:2024ct03112
Plaintiff:
Martinez Orlandis Black
Defendant:
Peter Adolf, Alan Ellis, Noell P. Tin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Daniel v. Fighter-Daniel et al
as 2:2024cv11218
Plaintiff:
Allen David Daniel
Defendant:
Teri Fighter-Daniel, M. Sorensen, Barber and others
MURZIKE v. QUINN et al
as 3:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
R QUINN, W GIELOW, J SANTIAGO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Wellpath et al
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Shelton R. Thomas
Defendant:
Wellpath, Jermaine White, Ricky Wilcox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stovall v. Henry
as 6:2024cv06035
Plaintiff:
Vandy D. Stovall and Black
Defendant:
Dr Guy Henry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MARCHANT v. CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES et al
as 2:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
AUTUMN MARCHANT
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH SERVICES, AMELIA BRUNER, CHRISTINA NUDI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Black #359135 v. Cook et al
as 1:2024cv00156
Plaintiff:
Eliejuawan James Black #359135
Defendant:
Unknown Cook, Unknown Ryan, Unknown Schutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vickers v. Dennis et al
as 4:2024cv04014
Plaintiff:
Victor Shane Vickers
Defendant:
Chief of Police Orlando Dennis, Former Sheriff Obie Simms, Sheriff Jeff Black and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EL v. BLACK
as 2:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
RYSHEID MALIK EL
Defendant:
Corrections Officer CHAD BLACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Carstarphen v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Andre Maurice Carstarphen, Jr.
Defendant:
Noah Price Oliver, Q. Brown, Level Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
