Cases 1 - 10 of 193
Frye v. South Carolina Department of Corrections, The et al
as 5:2024cv01893
Plaintiff:
Marion Wade Frye
Defendant:
South Carolina Department of Corrections, The, Director Bryan Sterling, Kenneth Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Sampson v. National Board of Medical Examiners
as 24-610
Plaintiff:
ROBERT SAMPSON
Defendant:
NATIONAL BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01698
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00410
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-2875
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv03928
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-1274
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00940
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Festus Ohan v. AMA, et al
as 23-35571
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FESTUS OKWUDILI OHAN
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, NATIONAL BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS, FEDERATION OF STATE MEDICAL BOARD, (FSMB) and others
Ricks v. State of Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2023cv00651
Plaintiff:
Wesley Ricks
Defendant:
State of Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Louisiana State Board of Medical Examiners, West Feliciana Parish and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
