Cases 1 - 10 of 130
BOGGS v. HOLMES et al
as 1:2024cv00784
Plaintiff:
MATTHEW BOGGS
Defendant:
CHASE HOLMES, JASON MYERS, TRAVIS KEMPTON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boggs v. Feds Agents et al
as 1:2024cv10982
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
Feds Agents, Bureau of Investigation and Patrol State Trooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boggs v. Range Rover et al
as 1:2024cv10983
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
Range Rover and Unknown Persons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boggs v. 34 Bowdoin et al
as 1:2024cv10986
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
34 Bowdoin and Alisa, Mike
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boggs v. Children Hospital
as 1:2024cv10984
Plaintiff:
Keon L. Boggs
Defendant:
Children Hospital
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Eldridge v. Boggs et al
as 0:2023cv00125
Plaintiff:
Mark Eldridge
Defendant:
Johnny W. Boggs, Elliott County Fiscal Court, Casey Brammell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reyes et al v. Boggs
as 1:2023cv05087
Plaintiff:
Danybe Suyapa Guevara Reyes, Cristopher Rene Gallardo Reyes and Sophia Daniela Gallardo Guevara
Defendant:
Lisa Irene Boggs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BERMUDEZ-BEY et al v. COLE et al
as 1:2023cv00894
Plaintiff:
Kani Adon Bermudez-Bey, Shon Green and REGIS KISHON GREEN
Defendant:
MARY KRISTINE (KRISTY) COLE, TERRY S. JOHNSON, CLIFF PARKER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Francis v. French et al
as 2:2023cv02658
Plaintiff:
Essence Francis
Defendant:
Cheri French, Layla Coll, Stephanie Cleland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boggs et al v. City of Cut Bank
as 4:2023cv00034
Plaintiff:
Tra Boggs, Dewayne Johnson and Roberta Corby
Defendant:
City of Cut Bank
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
