Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Ghonim v. Boone
as 0:2026cv63092
Defendant:
Michael Boone
Plaintiff:
Abdel Moustafa Ghonim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv04291
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Damian Jackson v. Patricia West
as 26-7168
Defendant:
K. COSBY, REGIONAL ABUDSMAN, HAROLD TAYLOR, (VPB) INTERVEIWER, JOSEPH WALTERS, DIRECTOR and others
Plaintiff:
DAMIAN JACKSON
Boone Newsmedia, Inc. v. Microsoft Corporation et al
as 3:2026cv00950
Defendant:
OpenAI Group PBC, OpenAI Foundation, OpenAI Holdings, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Boone Newsmedia, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Hicks v. Cerliano et al
as 6:2026cv00528
Plaintiff:
Marie Hicks
Defendant:
Maxey Cerliano, Jeffery Tyler Myers, Alyssa Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Boone v. Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
as 1:2026cv27465
Plaintiff:
James Boone
Defendant:
Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Doe et al v. Ruiz Palacios et al
as 8:2026cv00639
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Jennifer Martin
Defendant:
Martha Ruiz Palacios, Katrina Juleen Fewkes, Mark Labouchardiere and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byrd v. Pennsylvania Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2026cv03102
Plaintiff:
Glen Byrd
Defendant:
Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, McCelland, R. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
De Oliveira, MD v. Haynes and Boone, LLP
as 26-2972
Plaintiff:
DANIEL DOMINGUES DE OLIVEIRA, -, MD
Defendant:
HAYNES AND BOONE, LLP, AMANDA GAYER and LESLIE THORNE
Kinnard v. Sanchez, et al.
as 26-6884
Plaintiff:
KENNETH KINNARD
Defendant:
FRANK SANCHEZ, RALPH ROGERS, PHIL ROGERS and others
:
CCSF President LAVAUGHAN MOORE and Secretary ACE WASHINGTON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
