Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv00381
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv05181
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
USA v. Boone-Escorcia
as 26-50765
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Romeo Boone-Escorcia
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 26-5791
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Adams et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2026cv07485
Plaintiff:
Jamaal Adams, Janine Adelaja, Linda Alston and others
Defendant:
Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333 Civil Remedies: Anti-Terrorism Act of 1991
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02480
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Boone v. General Motors LLC
as 3:2026cv02938
Plaintiff:
Jacqueline Araiza Boone
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
CARROLL-BOONE WATER DISTRICT v. 3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.) et al
as 2:2026cv03747
Plaintiff:
CARROLL-BOONE WATER DISTRICT
Defendant:
3M COMPANY (f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co.), AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jeremy Behlmann v. Martin, et al
as 26-2706
Plaintiff:
Jeremy R. Behlmann
Defendant:
FNU Martin, CCDC corrections officer, FNU Martin, CDCC corrections officer, FNU Perkins, Boone County Jail corrections officer and others
Jeremy Behlmann v. Shaws, et al
as 26-2707
Plaintiff:
Jeremy R. Behlmann
Defendant:
FNU Shaws, Judge, FNU Johnson, Prosecutor, FNU Knight, Prosecutor and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
