Cases 21 - 30 of 2,010
Barnes v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Hon. Kath C. Hochul, Richard C. Finnegan, Marisa Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dale Boyer v. 3M Company, The et al
as 2:2023cv06774
Defendant:
3M Company, The, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company and others
Plaintiff:
Dale Boyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ason Brown v. Dwayne Lardin, et al
as 23-3115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ASON BROWN
Defendant / Appellee:
SERGEANT DWAYNE LARDIN, CAPTAIN STEPHANIE FRANK, CORRECTIONS OFFICER BOYER and others
CARDWELL v. HOLLIBAUGH et al
as 2:2023cv02156
Plaintiff:
JAMAR CARDWELL
Defendant:
KEN HOLLIBAUGH, DEPUTY TAYLOR, DAN CARO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Bounds v. Washington et al
as 2:2023cv13078
Plaintiff:
Deshaun Lamar Bounds
Defendant:
Raphael Washington, Mike Jamar, Boyer and others
Bruce Boyer v. City of Simi Valley
as 2:2023cv09566
Plaintiff:
Bruce Boyer
Defendant:
City of Simi Valley and DOES 1 to 101
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dan v. State of Nebraska et al
as 8:2023cv00532
Plaintiff:
Anthony T. Dan
Defendant:
State of Nebraska, Cherl Finn, Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
USA v. Michael Boyer
as 23-3253
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL BOYER
Storm v. McClusky et al
as 1:2023cv00502
Plaintiff:
Rick Storm and Rickie Storm
Defendant:
David McClusky, Dodds Hayden, Karen Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYER v. HAINSWORTH et al
as 3:2023cv00316
Petitioner:
FRANK BOYER
Respondent:
MELISSA HAINSWORTH, ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and SOMERSET COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
