Cases 11 - 20 of 11,404
Thompson v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2024cv21514
Plaintiff:
Brad Thompson
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
PATTERSON v. OPTUMRX, INC.
as 1:2024cv00689
Plaintiff:
Brad Patterson
Defendant:
OptumRX, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Dodd v. Foster et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Cameron Bryan Dodd
Defendant:
Brian Foster, Brad Hoenig, Mark Krugle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sinkevitch v. Cain
as 24-2508
Petitioner:
BRETT A. SINKEVITCH
Respondent:
BRAD CAIN, Superintendent, Snake River Correctional Institution
Ladd v. USA
as 1:2024cv00701
Petitioner:
Brad R. Ladd
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Hyper Ice, Inc. et al v. Bob and Brad, LLC
as 2:2024cv03212
Plaintiff:
Hyper Ice Inc. and Hyperice IP Subco LLC
Defendant:
Bob and Brad, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Bates v. Lawrence et al
as 2:2024cv00462
Plaintiff:
Brad L Bates
Defendant:
J Lawrence, Cathay Eplett and Anna M Neal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PS) Jacobs et al v. The Trustees of Princeton University et al
as 2:2024cv01143
Plaintiff:
Joel Brendon Jacobs and Kathleen Chambers
Defendant:
The Trustees of Princeton University, Princeton University Investment Co., Christopher Eisgruber and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Racketeering (RICO) Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Yourglich v. Pension Benefit Information LLC. et al
as 1:2024cv11004
Plaintiff:
Brad Yourglich
Defendant:
Pension Benefit Information, LLC and Does 1 through 10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
