Cases 21 - 30 of 47
Smith et al v. Saint Paul Travelers Company Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00002
Defendant:
Lyons Exit Realty Inc., Mobile County Inc., Clark Stankowski and others
Plaintiff:
Edmond Hudmond Smith, IV and Louis Holger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brakefield v. United States Government
as 2:2018cv00266
Plaintiff:
Scott Brakefield
Defendant:
The United States Government and United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Brakefield v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2018cv01438
Plaintiff:
Linda Brakefield
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , Johnson & Johnson Services Inc , Johnson & Johnson and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brakefield v. The United States Government
as 2:2017cv00285
Plaintiff:
Scott Brakefield
Defendant:
The United States Government
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv01374
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Grant v. Mason et al
as 2:2015cv00252
Plaintiff:
Julian Lewis Grant
Defendant:
Mac Mason, Tyler Miller, Chad Deyton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2015cv03722
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brakefield et al v. Lowe's Home Centers LLC
as 3:2015cv02339
Plaintiff:
John R Brakefield and Roberta E Brakefield
Defendant:
Lowe's Home Centers LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Brakefield v. Department of Homeland Security
as 2:2014cv00201
Plaintiff:
Scott Brakefield
Defendant:
Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ACKERMAN et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05853
Plaintiff:
PAULA ACKERMAN , RUBY ADAMS , CARL AGNELLO and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
