Cases 1 - 10 of 51
Poindexter v. Wilkins et al
as 4:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Eddie Poindexter
Defendant:
A Wilkins, L Davis, A Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Tasty Chick'n LLC
as 3:2023cv00167
Plaintiff:
Brandy Johnson
Defendant:
Tasty Chick'n LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Morningstar v. Smith et al
as 4:2023cv00460
Plaintiff:
Khanis Morningstar and Jeramye Hobbs
Defendant:
James H Smith, Jr, Charlotte Gardner, Aundrea Culclager and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Meade et al
as 1:2022cv06931
Plaintiff:
Brandy Johnson
Defendant:
John Meade, John-Paul Oliveto, The State of Illinois and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Bodeker et al
as 3:2022cv00192
Plaintiff:
Dakota Cheyenne Smith
Defendant:
Bodeker, S Berg, Brandy Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saundra Hall et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04975
Plaintiff:
Saundra Hall, Danielle Hamilton, Virginia Hamm and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Dixon #191514 v. Forsyth et al
as 1:2022cv00557
Plaintiff:
Carl Dixon #191514
Defendant:
William A. Forsyth, Christopher Becker, Robin D. Eslinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Hall et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00768
Plaintiff:
Saundra Hall, Danielle Hamilton, Virginia Hamm and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Hall et al v. Ford Motor Company
as DE/1:22-CV-00768
Plaintiff:
Hall, Saundra Hall, Danielle Hamilton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv02793
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
