Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 7,407
PRUDHOMME v. MICHLES et al
as 3:2024cv00217
Plaintiff: ADAM J PRUDHOMME
Defendant: MARCUS MICHLES, RAINEY BOOTH, ADRIAN BRIDGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Grant et al v. Bridge Homes - Atlanta
as 1:2024cv02140
Plaintiff: Caroline Danette Grant and Ckelsey Deshaun Grant
Defendant: Bridge Homes - Atlanta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Breach of Contract
In re: Wilkins
as 24-6097
Petitioner: In re: JIMMIE D. WILKINS
Respondent: CARRIE BRIDGES
In re: Dunn
as 24-6098
Petitioner: In re: ROBERT DAVID DUNN
Respondent: CARRIE BRIDGES, Warden
Bay Bridge Capital Partners, LLC v. National Fire & Marine Ins. Co.
as 2:2024cv01378
Plaintiff: Bay Bridge Capital Partners, LLC
Defendant: National Fire & Marine Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Belvieu Bridge Properties Group, LLC v. Nationwide General Insurance Company
as 1:2024cv01408
Plaintiff: Belvieu Bridge Properties Group, LLC
Defendant: Nationwide General Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Type: Contract Insurance
Mink v. Bridges et al
as 5:2024cv00484
Petitioner: Damon Lee Mink
Respondent: Carrie Bridges and Oklahoma State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Michael Williams, Jr. v. Edward Spagel, et al
as 24-1503
Plaintiff: MICHAEL BRUCE WILLIAMS, JR.
Defendant: EDWARD J. SPAGEL, JR., PETER DREGALLA, BALESK and others
Debtor: TAYLOR, CITY OF ERIE POLICE DEPT.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv21054
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182 Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01729
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?